Perfect and pluperfect: what is the relationship?
Identifieur interne : 001352 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 001351; suivant : 001353Perfect and pluperfect: what is the relationship?
Auteurs : Raphael SalkieSource :
- Journal of Linguistics [ 0022-2267 ] ; 1989-03.
Abstract
The English (present) perfect (e.g. I have gone) has been extensively studied in the theoretical literature on tense and aspect. The pluperfect (I had gone) has by contrast received relatively little attention, and the relationship between the present perfect and the pluperfect has been virtually ignored. Descriptive grammars of English also tend to say little about the latter two issues, beyond distinguishing cases such as (1)–(6), where the pluperfect seems to be the ‘past of the perfect’, from instances like (7)–(11), where the pluperfect is the ‘past of the past’ (cf. Thomson & Martinet, 1969: 112–13; Berland-Delépine, 1971: 95–6; Guitard, 1966: 206–7; Palmer, 1974: 54):
Url:
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226700012081
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001511
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001507
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001100
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 001365
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 001352
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Perfect and pluperfect: what is the relationship?</title><author><name sortKey="Salkie, Raphael" sort="Salkie, Raphael" uniqKey="Salkie R" first="Raphael" last="Salkie">Raphael Salkie</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:547EA3373D509633479C2E6680F1E81C0FAE4FDD</idno><date when="1989" year="1989">1989</date><idno type="doi">10.1017/S0022226700012081</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/6GQ-4LM7T4MH-7/fulltext.pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001511</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001511</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001507</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001100</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001100</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0022-2267:1989:Salkie R:perfect:and:pluperfect</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001365</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001352</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001352</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Perfect and pluperfect: what is the relationship?</title><author><name sortKey="Salkie, Raphael" sort="Salkie, Raphael" uniqKey="Salkie R" first="Raphael" last="Salkie">Raphael Salkie</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">Brighton Polytechnic and University of Poitiers</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Linguistics</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Ling.</title><idno type="ISSN">0022-2267</idno><idno type="eISSN">1469-7742</idno><imprint><publisher>Cambridge University Press</publisher><pubPlace>Cambridge, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1989-03">1989-03</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="34">34</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0022-2267</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0022-2267</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">The English (present) perfect (e.g. I have gone) has been extensively studied in the theoretical literature on tense and aspect. The pluperfect (I had gone) has by contrast received relatively little attention, and the relationship between the present perfect and the pluperfect has been virtually ignored. Descriptive grammars of English also tend to say little about the latter two issues, beyond distinguishing cases such as (1)–(6), where the pluperfect seems to be the ‘past of the perfect’, from instances like (7)–(11), where the pluperfect is the ‘past of the past’ (cf. Thomson & Martinet, 1969: 112–13; Berland-Delépine, 1971: 95–6; Guitard, 1966: 206–7; Palmer, 1974: 54):</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Salkie, Raphael" sort="Salkie, Raphael" uniqKey="Salkie R" first="Raphael" last="Salkie">Raphael Salkie</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/ChansonRoland/explor/ChansonRolandV7/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001352 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 001352 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= ChansonRoland
|area= ChansonRolandV7
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:547EA3373D509633479C2E6680F1E81C0FAE4FDD
|texte= Perfect and pluperfect: what is the relationship?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39. |  |